Microsoft cut 15,000 people in 2025 and is flattening its org chart going into 2026. Here is what your cloud, enterprise, and product experience is worth independently.

Microsoft cut more than 15,000 employees across 2025 in two major waves. The first round in May targeted approximately 6,000 in product and engineering. The second in July eliminated roughly 9,000 more — hitting gaming (Xbox, ZeniMax, King), customer support, sales, and mixed reality especially hard. The strategic logic is consistent with what is happening across big tech: Microsoft is spending $80 billion on AI infrastructure and flattening its management layers to fund it.

The Customer and Partner Solutions division — Microsoft's enterprise sales and account management arm — absorbed significant cuts. So did middle management across the company. This is deliberate. Microsoft is running an efficiency drive designed to remove coordination layers that accumulated during rapid growth and replace them with AI-assisted workflows. The people being cut were not failing at their jobs. Their jobs were reclassified as overhead.

Gaming deserves its own acknowledgment. Xbox and ZeniMax employees are leaving with creative, product, and operations experience that is genuinely unique. The gaming industry is smaller than enterprise tech, but adjacent industries — media, interactive entertainment, e-commerce, and consumer app development — are actively looking for people who understand how to build and manage products for highly engaged, demanding user bases. That is a transferable skill set.

‍

Microsoft's enterprise footprint is enormous. Hundreds of thousands of organizations run Microsoft 365, Azure, Teams, Dynamics, and Copilot. Most of them do not have internal staff with the depth of knowledge that senior Microsoft employees built. That knowledge gap is a market.

Former Microsoft enterprise sales directors and account managers are being hired by system integrators, consulting firms, and independent practices to advise on Microsoft stack implementations. Rates typically run $175 to $300 per hour. Azure cloud architects and engineering managers who move into independent work often serve mid-market companies navigating cloud migration or multi-cloud strategy at $200 to $375 per hour.

Sales leadership and customer success directors coming out of Microsoft's Customer and Partner Solutions organization are particularly well-positioned to consult with SaaS companies trying to build or restructure their enterprise sales motions. Retainers in this space range from $8,000 to $16,000 per month — because the advice directly impacts revenue, which makes it easy for a client to justify the cost.

‍

Microsoft senior managers typically earned $200,000 to $340,000 in total compensation including stock awards. Directors ranged from $300,000 to $500,000. The equity component has been meaningful given Microsoft's strong stock performance, which makes the loss of unvested shares a real financial hit for people caught mid-vest cycle.

To establish your consulting rate, divide your annual income target by expected billable hours. At 1,000 billable hours — a reasonable first-year target — a $240,000 income goal requires a $240 per hour rate. That is achievable for Microsoft-level experience with a clear positioning statement.

What most people overlook is the transition period. Your first six months of consulting will likely produce less than your target run rate, because you are simultaneously building a client base and delivering work. Build a financial cushion that covers six months of personal expenses before you start, and price your services at your target rate from day one — not at a discount you plan to raise later. Discounting early sets a floor that is hard to raise with the same client.

‍

Microsoft employees often struggle with positioning because the company does so many things. You need to pick the lane that is most marketable based on what you actually did, not the full breadth of what Microsoft covers.

If you were in enterprise sales or customer success, your positioning is around revenue: you help companies sell complex software to large organizations, build their enterprise account motion, or improve retention. If you were in Azure or engineering, your positioning is around infrastructure and scale. If you were in gaming or consumer, your positioning is around product design and user engagement.

The Microsoft name carries real weight across every industry that uses enterprise software — which is effectively all of them. Use it. Former Microsoft senior employees are taken seriously immediately in a way that takes other people years to build. The challenge is converting that credibility into a clear value statement fast enough that the conversation does not end at "oh interesting, what did you work on there?" That requires having a specific answer ready about the problem you solve now.

‍